You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Quantitative Assessment of the Role of Crack Tip Constraint on Ductile Tearing

    Published: 01 January 1993

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (276K) 15 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (9.0M) 514 $122   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The quantities describing constraint and triaxiality and their relation with each other are discussed for various loading conditions and specimen geometries by comparing numerical simulations of crack growth based on the J-integral concept and on micromechanical damage models with the corresponding experiments.

    It is shown that the “geometry dependence” of JR-curves is a natural feature due to different patterns of plastic flow and micromechanical processes depending on the local stress state. Hence, this dependence cannot and should not be overcome by manipulating the definition of J. A pragmatic definition of a local triaxiality parameter is given that gives reliable and reproducible results. A linear relationship is found between the triaxiality and the tearing modulus of various specimens of the same material.


    constraint, triaxiality, ductile fracture, tearing resistance, micromechanical models, J, -integral, J, -resistance curve, geometry effects

    Author Information:

    Brocks, W
    Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin 45,

    Schmitt, W
    Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik (FhIWM), Freiburg,

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.08

    DOI: 10.1520/STP18023S