You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Bioassay-Based Risk Assessment of Complex Mixtures

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (204K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (3.8M) 197 $55   ADD TO CART


    The baseline risk assessment often plays an integral role in various decision-making processes at Superfund sites. The present study reports on risk characterizations prepared for seven complex mixtures using biological and chemical analysis. Three of the samples (A, B, and C) were complex mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) extracted from coal tar; while four samples (001, 002, 004 and 006) extracted from munitions-contaminated soil contained primarily nitroaromatic hydrocarbons. The chemical-based risk assessment ranked sample C as least toxic, while the risk associated with samples A and B was approximately equal. The microbial bioassay was in general agreement for the coal tar samples. The weighted activity of the coal tar extracts in Salmonella was 4,960 for sample C, and 162,000 and 206,000 for samples A and B, respectively. The bacterial mutagenicity of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene contaminated soils exhibited an indirect correlation with chemical-based risk assessment. The aqueous extract of sample 004 induced 1,292 net revertants in Salmonella, while the estimated risk to ingestion and dermal adsorption (based on TNT content) was 2E-9. The data indicate that the chemical-based risk assessment accurately predicted the genotoxicity of the PAHs, while the accuracy of the risk assessment for munitions contaminated soils was limited due to the presence of metabolites of TNT degradation. The biological tests used in this research provide a valuable compliment to chemical analysis for characterizing the genotoxic risk of complex mixtures.


    risk assessment, hazardous waste, bioassay, Salmonella typhimurium

    Author Information:

    Donnelly, KC
    Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

    Huebner, HJ
    Research Associate, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

    Committee/Subcommittee: D18.14

    DOI: 10.1520/STP16022S