Published: Jan 1988
| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|PDF (220K)||13||$25||  ADD TO CART|
|Complete Source PDF (20M)||1091||$132||  ADD TO CART|
The J-integral and the crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) are widely used throughout the world to measure the fracture toughness of structural materials. There are many similarities between these two parameters, as well as a number of important differences. Because of these differences, the CTOD parameter tends to be more conservative when applied to structures.
The J-integral and CTOD were compared qualitatively and analytically. This work differs from previous comparisons in that the present study compared engineering estimates of J and CTOD, which are not necessarily equal to the true values of J and CTOD. However, the fracture toughness of a material is nearly always characterized in terms of the engineering approximations of J or CTOD.
The main difference between J and CTOD as measures of toughness is that J is directly proportional to the area under the load-displacement curve whereas CTOD is proportional to the clip gage displacement. This means that the relationship between the two parameters depends on strain hardening and constraint.
crack-tip opening displacement, elastic-plastic fracture mechanics, J-integral, fitness for purpose
Assistant professor of mechanical engineering, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX