Standard Active Last Updated: Jan 12, 2024 Track Document
ASTM F3651/F3651M-23

Standard Practice for Determining Safe-Life, Inspection Threshold and Recurring Inspection Intervals

Standard Practice for Determining Safe-Life, Inspection Threshold and Recurring Inspection Intervals F3651_F3651M-23 ASTM|F3651_F3651M-23|en-US Standard Practice for Determining Safe-Life, Inspection Threshold and Recurring Inspection Intervals Standard new BOS Vol. 15.09 Committee F44
$ 63.00 In stock
ASTM International

Significance and Use

4.1 This practice provides one means for determining the scatter factors to establish either the safe-life, or inspection threshold, or recurring inspection intervals, or combinations thereof, as a result of aeroplane durability and damage tolerance assessments. This information can be used in conjunction with Specification F3115/F3115M.

4.1.1 This practice defines scatter factors or factors to be used on the unfactored test or analytical mean lives, or both, for determining factored lives (that is, safe-life, inspection threshold, or recurring inspection intervals, or combinations thereof). These factors may be related to but are different from other factors such as load enhancement factor, and life factor that are used to compensate for long test duration. For guidance on life and load enhancement factors, refer to DOT/FAA/AR-10/6 or from relevant CAAs.

4.1.2 The unfactored test or analytical mean life, or both, must be determined prior to the usage of this standard practice (see 4.5.1).

4.2 The material presented herein is derived from the references listed in Section 2.

4.3 Either the safe-life or inspection thresholds can be determined for the entire aeroplane or separately for components such as wing, empennage, landing gear, control surfaces, etc. Such determinations are based on test(s), similarity to previous test(s), or analysis supported by tests. Recurring inspection intervals are typically determined on the same basis but may also be supported by in-service data.

4.4 The scatter factors described in this practice are applicable to cyclic test data that meets the following criteria:

4.4.1 The cyclic test article must be representative of the production article. Careful consideration must be given for any modifications or alterations, or both, made to the test article prior to or during testing, or both, for metallic structures.

4.4.2 At the completion of full-scale or component fatigue/cyclic tests (excluding landing gear), the residual strength capability must be demonstrated before determining either the safe-life, or inspection threshold.

4.5 The following are not within the scope of this standard:

4.5.1 Methodologies of durability, damage tolerance analysis, or test, or combinations thereof.

4.5.2 Structures which use novel fabrication methods such as friction stir welding, additive manufacturing, and thermoplastic welding.

4.5.3 Structural bonding (except already proven metal-to-metal bonding, etc.); for guidance on structural bonding refer to AC 20-107B (or AMC 20-29).

4.6 The Finite Element Model (FEM) used for analysis must be validated with test data, or other independent analysis methods in accordance with relevant CAA requirements.

4.7 The inspection intervals determined using this practice are independent of other inspection intervals that are defined by other process, such as Maintenance Steering Group (MSG).

Scope

1.1 This practice provides guidance to determine scatter factors to establish either the safe-life, or inspection threshold, and inspection intervals to be published in the Airworthiness Limitation section of the maintenance manual in order to maintain continued airworthiness. The guidance materials presented herein for a means of compliance based on cyclic testing, damage tolerance testing, fatigue analysis, or damage tolerance analysis, or combinations thereof. The material was developed through open consensus of international experts in general aviation. The information was created by focusing on Levels 1, 2, 3 and 4 Normal Category aeroplanes. The content may be more broadly applicable; it is the responsibility of the applicant to substantiate broader applicability as a specific means of compliance.

1.2 An applicant intending to propose this information as Means of Compliance for a design approval must seek guidance from their respective oversight authority (for example, published guidance from applicable civil aviation authorities, or CAAs) concerning the acceptable use and application thereof. For information on which oversight authorities have accepted this standard (whole or in part) as an acceptable Means of Compliance to their regulatory requirements (hereinafter “the Rules”), refer to the ASTM Committee F44 web page (www.astm.org/COMMITTEE/F44.htm).

1.3 Units—This document may present information in either SI units, English Engineering units, or both; the values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents. Each system shall be used independently of the other; combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard.

1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Price:
Contact Sales
Related
Reprints and Permissions
Reprints and copyright permissions can be requested through the
Copyright Clearance Center
Details
Book of Standards Volume: 15.09
Developed by Subcommittee: F44.30
Pages: 6
DOI: 10.1520/F3651_F3651M-23