| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|7||$45.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Hardcopy (shipping and handling)||7||$45.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Standard + Redline PDF Bundle||14||$54.00||  ADD TO CART|
Significance and Use
5.1 Forensic analysis of fiber colorants using TLC should be considered for single fiber comparisons only when it is not possible to discriminate between the fibers of interest using other techniques, such as comparison microscopy (brightfield and fluorescence) and microspectrophotometry in the visible range.
5.2 The extraction procedures carried out prior to TLC analysis can provide useful information about dye classification. TLC can provide useful qualitative information about dye components. Similar colors made up of different dye components can be differentiated using this technique. The application of TLC may serve to discriminate between fibers, or it may confirm their similarity.
5.3 TLC may be prohibitively difficult or undesirable in some circumstances. Short lengths of fibers or pale colored fibers may not have an adequate concentration of colorant present to be examined. Dye extraction from some fibers may be impossible. The desire to preserve evidence for possible analysis by another examiner may preclude removing the color for analysis.
5.4 Dye from the known material should first be characterized and eluent systems evaluated to achieve optimum separation of the extract. Dye is then extracted from single known and questioned fibers, using an equivalent amount of material.
5.5 The development of each individual TLC plate will show some variability as a result of the coating and conditioning of the plate, solvent condition, and temperature. It is important to evaluate the performance of each TLC plate by spotting known materials along with the questioned samples. See Ref (1).3
5.6 Examples for the preparation of Standard dye mixtures are given in Appendix X1.
1.1 Metameric coloration of fibers can be detected using UV/visible spectrophotometry. If spectrophotometry is restricted to the visible spectral range only, differences in dye components may remain undetected. One method of detecting additional components is to use thin-layer chromatography (TLC). TLC is an inexpensive, simple, well-documented technique that, under certain conditions, can be used to complement the use of visible spectroscopy in comparisons of fiber colorants. The principle of the method is that the dye components are separated by their differential migration caused by a mobile phase flowing through a porous, adsorptive medium.
1.2 This standard does not replace knowledge, skill, ability, experience, education, or training and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents (purchase separately) The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
E1459 Guide for Physical Evidence Labeling and Related Documentation
E1492 Practice for Receiving, Documenting, Storing, and Retrieving Evidence in a Forensic Science Laboratory
E2224 Guide for Forensic Analysis of Fibers by Infrared Spectroscopy
E2228 Guide for Microscopical Examination of Textile Fibers
ICS Number Code 71.040.50 (Physicochemical methods of analysis)
|Link to Active (This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.)|
ASTM E2227-13, Standard Guide for Forensic Examination of Non-Reactive Dyes in Textile Fibers by Thin-Layer Chromatography, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, www.astm.orgBack to Top