Effective and efficient use of urban public assets depends on the nature of the revenue a city uses to provide infrastructure assets and various services. If the city does not tax residents’ wages (labor) or capital (their home structures and improvements on land property), but instead taxes land value, significant economic justice is provided. The reason it is just, is that whereas the previous arrangement subsidizes speculative investors of vacant lots and empty office buildings with how tax rates, the new arrangement would tax those sites on par with adjacent sites productively engaged. In this way, the average resident/stakeholder retains their earned wealth for housing, healthcare, and other important services and speculators give up unearned wealth. The standard introduces two performance measures, the first is - Land value capture and return intensity index (LVCRII) indicator.
It is the ratio, i.e., %, of the annual increment of land value (i.e., the change in land value from the previous year) captured and returned [e.g., to the municipality providing urban services and infrastructure to the total non-land revenue of the city for that year for the non-regional, municipal level organization. Land value itself would be determined by a real property assessor.
The second performance measure is - % of property tax revenue to the city from land value compared to building value.
Keywords
circular; public asset; asset management; land value; land value capture; land value return; property tax; necessary waste; measurement; performance
Rationale
Typically, a portion of land value, as economic rent, is not taxed, but instead is allowed to be distributed unearned to the party occupying the land. This limits revenue that could be used to offset taxes on residents’ wages and capital. By increasing the revenue a city uses through land value taxation, economic justice is served. Secondly, there is no standard procedure today that defines how a city can perform in a total circular way. ISO 59000-series standards get close when a person borrows performance measures from the ISO 59000-series standards on the Circular Economy concerning private (primarily manufacturing) firms. The part ISO misses is the process whereby: 1) Customers consume what a city provides while paying taxes of various sorts to keep assets in improved condition; 2) in so doing, consumers increase the value of land in the city, which, if land values are captured and returned to the agencies that provide urban services and those services stay in good condition; 3) land values continue to rise; and 4) thus creating a perfectly circular process. ISO 59000 lacks the necessary depth a city needs to assess its total circular performance. This standard provides a process by which measurements can be made to characterize a city’s economy by the circularity of the revenue used to keep the city a desirable place to live.