Journal Published Online: 05 January 2018
Volume 46, Issue 4

Relationship between Computed Rate Constants and the Variability in Maturity-Based Strength Predictions

CODEN: JTEVAB

Abstract

ASTM C1074-11, Standard Practice for Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method, provides instructions for applying the Nurse-Saul and Freiesleben-Hansen Pedersen maturity methods, including ways to obtain the key parameters of datum temperature (T0) or the Arrhenius activation energy (Ea). Default values are provided along with three alternative computational methods for determining a mixture-specific value of T0 or Ea from experimental data, as detailed in C1074-11 Annex A1. This paper demonstrates via examples that the accuracy of the resulting strength estimates can vary considerably depending on which of the three alternatives is selected, potentially masking the more intrinsic variability of these parameters as influenced by composition or temperature. One source of this observed variability is the statistical bias known to characterize the “double reciprocal linearization” regression technique, which is utilized in two of the three ASTM methods. While recommending the deletion of these statistically biased estimators, the authors support the more rigorous nonlinear regression method (A1.1.8.1) as well as simpler functional forms; they affirm the reasonableness of the ASTM default values for T0 and Ea.

Author Information

Lee, Chang Hoon
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Western New England University, Springfield, MA
Hover, Kenneth C.
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Pages: 13
Price: $25.00
Related
Reprints and Permissions
Reprints and copyright permissions can be requested through the
Copyright Clearance Center
Details
Stock #: JTE20160181
ISSN: 0090-3973
DOI: 10.1520/JTE20160181