| Format | Pages | Price |   |
![]() |
4 | $46.00 | ![]() |
|
![]() |
Hardcopy (shipping and handling) | 4 | $46.00 | ![]() |
Historical Version(s) - view previous versions of standard
More F17.62 Standards Related Products Standard References
Significance and Use
5.1 LCC analysis is an economic method to evaluate alternatives that are characterized by differing cash flows over the designated project design life. The method entails calculating the LCC of each alternative capable of satisfying the functional requirements of the project and comparing them to determine which have the lowest estimated LCC over the project design life.
5.2 The LCC method is particularly suitable for determining whether the higher initial cost of an alternative is economically justified by reductions in future costs (for example, operating maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement) when compared to an alternative with lower initial costs but higher future costs. If a design alternative has both a lower initial cost and lower future costs than other alternatives, an LCC analysis is not necessary to show the former is the economically preferable choice.
1. Scope
1.1 This practice establishes a procedure for using life cycle cost (LCC) analysis techniques to evaluate alternative drainage system designs, using plastic pipe that satisfy the same functional requirements.
1.2 The LCC technique measures the present value of all relevant costs to install, operate, and maintain alternative drainage systems such as engineering, construction, maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement over a specified period of time. The practice also accommodates any remaining residual or salvage value.
1.3 The decision maker, using the results of the LCC analysis, can then identify the alternative(s) with the lowest estimated total cost based on the present value of all costs.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents (purchase separately) The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
Other Standards
Federal Office of Management and Budget Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs and state documents for guidelines or requirements Available from Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC. TM-5-802-1 Economic Studies for Military Construction Design Applications (12/86) Available from Headquarters, Department of the Army, Washington, DC.ICS Code
ICS Number Code 03.100.50 (Production. Production management); 23.040.20 (Plastic pipes)
UNSPSC Code
UNSPSC Code 40171500(Commercial pipe and piping)
Link Here | |||
Link to Active (This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.) | |||
DOI: 10.1520/F1675-13R17
Citation Format
ASTM F1675-13(2017), Standard Practice for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Plastic Pipe Used for Culverts, Storm Sewers, and Other Buried Conduits, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, www.astm.org
Back to Top