If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    ASTM E3265 - 21

    Standard Guide for Evaluating Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluid Foaming Tendency

    Active Standard ASTM E3265 | Developed by Subcommittee: E34.50

    Book of Standards Volume: 11.03


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 5 $54.00   ADD TO CART
    Hardcopy (shipping and handling) 5 $54.00   ADD TO CART
    Standard + Redline PDF Bundle 10 $64.00   ADD TO CART



    Significance and Use

    4.1 The process of recirculating MWFs entrains air bubbles which can accumulate, forming foam.

    4.2 Optimally, air bubbles burst open quickly after they are created. However, air bubble persistence is affected by MWF chemistry and the mechanisms by which energy is introduced into recirculating MWFs.

    4.2.1 The primary mechanisms imparting energy into recirculating MWFs are:

    4.2.1.1 Turbulent Flow—The high velocity (typically >0.75 m3 min–1; >200 gal min–1).

    4.2.1.2 Impaction—Energy generated when MWF strikes the tool-workpiece zone.

    4.2.1.3 Centrifugal Force—MWF moved by the force of rotating tools or work pieces.

    4.3 When air bubbles persist, they tend to accumulate as foam. Persistent foam can:

    4.3.1 Inhibit heat transfer;

    4.3.2 Cause pump impeller cavitation;

    4.3.3 Foul filters;

    4.3.4 Overflow from MWF sumps;

    4.3.5 Prevent proper lubrication;

    4.3.6 Contribute to MWF mist formation, including bioaerosol dispersion; and

    4.3.7 Contribute to safety and hygiene hazards in the plant.

    4.4 To prevent the adverse effects of MWF foam accumulation, chemical agents are either formulated into MWF concentrate, added tankside, or both.

    4.5 Laboratory tests are used to predict MWF foaming characteristics in end-use applications. However, no individual test is universally appropriate.

    4.6 This guide reviews test protocols commonly in use to evaluate end-use diluted MWF foaming tendency and the impact of foam-control agents on MWF foaming tendency.

    1. Scope

    1.1 This guide provides an overview of foaming tendency evaluation protocols and their appropriate use.

    1.2 ASTM Test Methods D3519 and D3601 were withdrawn in 2013. Although each method had some utility, neither method reliably predicted in-use foaming tendency. Since Test Methods D3519 and D3601 were first adopted, several more predictive test protocols have been developed. However, it is also common knowledge that no single protocol is universally suitable for predicting water-miscible metalworking fluid (MWF) foaming tendency.

    1.3 Moreover, there are no generally recognized reference standard fluids (either MWF or foam-control additive). Instead it is important to include a relevant reference sample in all testing.

    1.4 The age of the reference and test fluid concentrates can be an important factor in their foaming behavior. Ideally, freshly prepared concentrates should be held at laboratory room temperature for at least one week before diluting for foam testing. This ensures that any neutralization reactions have reached equilibrium and enables microemulsions to reach particle size equilibrium. During screening tests, it is also advisable to test fluids after the concentrates have been heat aged and subjected to freeze/thaw treatment.

    1.5 The dilution water quality can have a major impact on foaming properties. In general, fluid concentrates diluted with hard water will foam less than those diluted with soft, deionized, or reverse osmosis water. Screening tests using the expected range of dilution water quality are highly recommended.

    1.6 The temperature of the tested fluids can have a major impact on foaming properties. In general, test fluids should be held and tested at temperatures that closely mimic the real-world application and process.

    1.7 Cleanliness of test apparatus is critical during foam evaluation testing. Traces of residue on labware can significantly impact the observed foaming tendency of a test fluid. Best practice is to clean any glassware or other vessels using some version of a chemical cleaner that will alleviate any risk of cross contamination.

    1.8 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.

    1.9 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

    1.10 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.


    2. Referenced Documents (purchase separately) The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.

    ASTM Standards

    D3519 Test Method for Foam in Aqueous Media (Blender Test)

    D3601 Test Method for Foam In Aqueous Media (Bottle Test)

    E2523 Terminology for Metalworking Fluids and Operations


    Referencing This Standard
    Link Here
    Link to Active (This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.)

    DOI: 10.1520/E3265-21

    Citation Format

    ASTM E3265-21, Standard Guide for Evaluating Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluid Foaming Tendency, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021, www.astm.org

    Back to Top