| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|5||$52.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Hardcopy (shipping and handling)||5||$52.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Standard + Redline PDF Bundle||10||$62.00||  ADD TO CART|
Significance and Use
4.1 Geomembranes are used as low-permeability barriers to control liquids from leaking from landfills, ponds, and other containments. The liquids may contain contaminants that, if released, can cause damage to the environment. Leaking liquids can also erode the subgrade. Leakage can result in product loss or otherwise prevent the installation from performing its intended containment purpose. For these reasons, it is desirable that the geomembrane have as little leakage as practical.
4.2 Geomembrane leaks can result even when the quality of the subgrade preparation, the quality of the material placed on the geomembrane, and the quality of the workmanship are not deficient.
4.3 Electrical leak location methods are an effective final quality assurance (QA) measure to locate previously undetected leaks in electrically insulating geomembranes. Practices for these implementations are contained in Guide and Practices , , , , , and .
4.4 It is important to realize that the detection of leaks depends not only on the capabilities of the leak location equipment, procedures, and experience of the leak location practitioner, but also on local site conditions that are not under the control of the leak location practitioner. In particular, to detect a leak, there shall be an electrical conduction path through the leak and through the materials above and below the leak to allow sufficient electrical current through the leak for detection. Some site conditions, such as a leak not making contact with the subgrade, dry geotextile, or geocomposite above or below the leak; dry materials above or below the leak; degree of isolation between the materials above and below the geomembrane; and other factors, may preclude the detection of leaks. Therefore, the use of a properly placed actual leak is also a test of site preparations and conditions.
4.5 It is not necessarily proper to conclude that, if an actual leak is not detected, a leak location survey using the proper relevant ASTM International standard has no validity. Other leaks that have more favorable local conditions and larger leaks may still be detected.
4.6 The importance of blind actual leaks is to provide an additional measure to assess whether the site conditions throughout the entire survey area are proper for a leak location survey and that the electric leak location survey is performed correctly and completely. The use of blind actual leaks provides: (1) a check that the equipment is operating properly, (2) a test for proper survey coverage, and (3) a check that all survey data (results) have been assessed to confirm a proper survey has been done. These all result in a high likelihood that significant-sized leaks are detected.
4.7 The placement of blind actual leaks should not replace hiring a reputable and qualified leak location practitioner to perform the electrical leak location survey. Many site-specific issues and technical limitations can preclude the detection of actual leaks, but a non-expert will find it difficult to impossible to determine whether the non-detection of actual leaks is due to survey performance errors or issues with site conditions. It is therefore important to achieve a satisfactory resolution to any issues with the non-detection of actual leaks but, much more importantly, to check leak location practitioner references and qualifications before hiring. In addition to checking references from previous clients, qualifications should include reports from at least three projects completed, similar in cross section to the proposed project, where actual leaks were found. The report output should provide indisputable evidence that the survey was performed effectively.
4.8 It is important to note that the placement of actual leaks may affect the sensitivity of the electrical leak location survey for geomembranes covered with soil or water or both. The placement of actual leaks larger than the leaks present in the lining system may preclude detection of those smaller leaks, especially for highly conductive cover materials.
1.1 This guide is for placing (blind) actual leaks in geomembranes before performing an electrical leak location survey. The geomembranes can be bare (not covered) or can be covered with water or moist soil.
1.2 This guide is intended to serve as an additional quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) measure to ensure that leaks through the geomembrane are detectable, site conditions are proper for leak location surveys, and a valid and complete leak location survey is performed. Because various leak location practitioners use a wide variety of equipment to perform these surveys and have a wide range of expertise, placement of actual leaks by the owner or owner’s representative helps ensure that the leak location survey is being performed correctly and completely.
1.3 Placing actual leaks should be done with the consent and knowledge of all involved parties and specifically the “owner” of the geomembrane. Geomembranes are typically purchased and installed by dedicated geosynthetic installers who “own” the geomembrane until the ownership gets transferred to the end user. A project meeting should be set up with the owner, the consultant, the geosynthetic installers, and the leak location contractor. The intention to use actual leaks should be clearly stated by the owner or consultants or both, and the scope and number to be placed should be understood by all parties. The consultant should broadly identify to the lining contractor a location that can be easily repaired after the test. It is critical that all actual leaks be included on the liner documentation and repair record drawing.
1.4 Leak location surveys can be used on geomembranes installed in basins, ponds, tanks, ore and waste pads, landfill cells, landfill caps, and other containment facilities. The procedures are applicable for geomembranes made of electrically insulating materials. (Warning—The electrical methods used for geomembrane leak location could use high voltages, resulting in the potential for electrical shock or electrocution. This hazard might be increased because operations might be conducted in or near water. In particular, a high voltage could exist between the water or earth material and earth ground or any grounded conductor. These procedures are potentially very dangerous and can result in personal injury or death. The electrical methods used for geomembrane leak location should be attempted only by qualified and experienced personnel. Appropriate safety measures shall be taken to protect the leak location operators as well as other people at the site.)
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents (purchase separately) The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
D4439 Terminology for Geosynthetics
D6747 Guide for Selection of Techniques for Electrical Leak Location of Leaks in Geomembranes
D7002 Practice for Electrical Leak Location on Exposed Geomembranes Using the Water Puddle Method
D7007 Practices for Electrical Methods for Locating Leaks in Geomembranes Covered with Water or Earthen Materials
D7240 Practice for Electrical Leak Location Using Geomembranes with an Insulating Layer in Intimate Contact with a Conductive Layer via Electrical Capacitance Technique (Conductive-Backed Geomembrane Spark Test)
D7703 Practice for Electrical Leak Location on Exposed Geomembranes Using the Water Lance Method
D7953 Practice for Electrical Leak Location on Exposed Geomembranes Using the Arc Testing Method
D8265 Practices for Electrical Methods for Mapping Leaks in Installed Geomembranes
ICS Number Code 59.080.70 (Geotextiles)
UNSPSC Code 30121701(Geomesh)
|Link to Active (This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.)|
ASTM D7909-21, Standard Guide for Placement of (Blind) Actual Leaks During Electrical Leak Location Surveys of Geomembranes, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021, www.astm.orgBack to Top