ASTM D2229 - 10(2014)


    Active Standard ASTM D2229 Developed by Subcommittee: D13.19

    Book of Standards Volume: 07.01

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 19 $97.00   ADD TO CART

    Historical Version(s) - view previous versions of standard

    Translated Standard(s): English

    ASTM License Agreement

    More D13.19 Standards Related Products

    Significance and Use

    5.1 This test method is considered satisfactory for the acceptance testing of commercial shipments of steel tire cord because current estimates of between-laboratory precision for single materials are considered acceptable and the method has been used extensively in the trade for acceptance testing.

    5.1.1 If there are differences or practical significances between reported test results for two laboratories (or more), comparative tests should be performed to determine if there is a statistical bias between them, using competent statistical assistance. As a minimum, the test samples should be used that are as homogenous as possible, that are drawn from the material from which the disparate test results were obtained, and that are randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory for testing. Other materials with established test values may be used for this purpose. The test results from the two laboratories should be compared using a statistical test for unpaired data, at a probability level chosen prior to the testing series. If a bias is found, either its cause must be found and corrected, or future test results must be adjusted in consideration of the known bias.

    5.2 The mold described in this test method is primarily designed for quality acceptance testing for steel cord where the sample size for each cord is 4 or a multiple thereof, but any mold/cavity combination which will provide the required test block dimensions (Figs. 1 and 2) is acceptable.

     Definition of Test Block Dimensions
    FIG. 1 Definition of Test Block Dimensions
    Four-Cavity Steel Cord Adhesion Mold
      All dimensions ±0.2
      Angular ±2°
      Except where noted
    Note 1All dimensions in millimetres except where noted.
    Note 2Material—Mild steel.
    Note 3Mold should be coated permanently with a polytetrafluoro-ethylene, such as Teflon®, or preferably, with a stainless steel reinforced polytetrafluoro-ethylene with a polyamid binder, such as Excalibur®.4
    Note 4Dimensions with “*” may be altered to accommodate test grips.
    FIG. 2 Four-Cavity Steel Cord Adhesion Mold

    5.3 Appendix X1 contains suggested ranges of environmental conditions for aging tests.

    5.4 The property measured by this test method indicates whether the adhesion of the steel cord to the rubber is greater than the cohesion of the rubber, that is, complete rubber coverage of the steel cord, or less than the cohesion of the rubber, that is, lack of rubber coverage.

    1. Область применения

    1.1 Данный метод используется для определения силы, необходимой для отрыва металлического корда от блока вулканизированной резины.

    1.2 Хотя данный метод изначально разрабатывался для металлокорда, он может применяться с некоторыми изменениями для проволоки, используемой в резинотехнических изделиях.

    1.3 Данный метод также может использоваться для оценки характеристик резиновой смеси, касающихся сцепления с металлокордом.

    1.4 Значения, указанные в единицах СИ, должны рассматриваться как стандартные. Никакие другие единицы измерения не включены в данный стандарт.

    1.5Данный стандарт не претендует на полноту описания всех мер безопасности, если таковые имеются, связанных с его использованием. Вся ответственность за установление соответствующих правил техники безопасности и мер по охране здоровья, а также определение пределов применимости регламентов до начала использования данного стандарта, лежит на пользователе стандарта.

    2. Ссылочные документы