| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|21||$72.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Hardcopy (shipping and handling)||21||$72.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Standard + Redline PDF Bundle||42||$86.00||  ADD TO CART|
Significance and Use
5.1 This practice supports the development of material behavior models that can be used to estimate performance of the EBS materials during the post-closure period of a high-level nuclear waste repository for times much longer than can be tested directly. This practice is intended for modeling the degradation behaviors of materials proposed for use in an EBS designed to contain radionuclides over tens of thousands of years and more. There is both national and international recognition of the importance of the use and long-term performance of engineered materials in geologic repository design. Use of the models developed following the approaches described in this practice is intended to address established regulations, such as:
5.1.1 U.S. Public Law 97–425, the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, provides for the deep geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste through a system of multiple barriers. These barriers include engineered barriers designed to prevent the migration of radionuclides out of the engineered system, and the geologic host medium that provides an additional transport barrier between the engineered system and biosphere. The regulations of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for geologic disposal require a performance confirmation program to provide data through tests and analyses, where practicable, that demonstrate engineered systems and components that are designed or assumed to act as barriers after permanent closure are functioning as intended and anticipated.
5.1.2 IAEA Safety Requirements specify that engineered barriers shall be designed and the host environment shall be selected to provide containment of the radionuclides associated with the wastes.
5.1.3 The Swedish Regulatory Authority has provided general advice to the repository developer that the application of best available technique be followed in connection with disposal, which means that the siting, design, construction, and operation of the repository and appurtenant system components should be carried out so as to prevent, limit, and delay releases from both engineered and geological barriers as far as is reasonably possible.
5.1.4 The Regulatory Authority in Finland identified the need to support the safety assessment stating that the input data and models utilized in the safety case shall be based on high-quality research data and expert judgement. Data and models shall be validated as far as possible and correspond to the conditions likely to prevail at the disposal site during the assessment period.
5.1.5 The Office of Nuclear Regulation in the United Kingdom will regulate an operating geological repository under the Nuclear Installations Act through application of the Safety Assessment Principles developed for all nuclear facilities and the post-closure disposal period will be regulated under the Radioactive Substances Act by the Environmental Agency. The two regulators have a Memorandum of Understanding outlining how the regulators work together (onr.org.uk/wastemanage/position-statement.pdf).
5.2 This practice aids in defining acceptable methods for making useful estimations of long-term behavior of materials from such sources as test data, scientific theory, and analogs.
5.3 This practice recognizes that technical information and test data regarding the actual behavior of EBS materials will by necessity be based on test durations that are short relative to the time periods required for geologic disposal (for example, thousands of years and longer). In addition to use in formulating acceptable long-term performance models data from short-term tests are used to support the EBS design and selection of materials. For example, low confidence in a degradation model for one material may justify the selection of alternative EBS barrier materials that can be modelled with higher confidence. It is expected that the data and model will reflect the intended application of establishing design criteria, comparison of performance assessment results with safety limits, etc. See Section for further discussion on model support and confidence.
5.4 The EBS environment of interest is that defined by the natural conditions (for example, minerals, moisture, biota, and mechanical stresses); changes that occur over time, during repository construction and operation, and as a consequence of radionuclide decay, namely, radiation, radiation-induced damage, heating, and radiolytic effects on the solution chemistry; and changes that may occur over the post-closure period. Environmental conditions associated with disruptive events (for example, mechanical stress from seismic events) and processes (for example, changes in water chemistry) should also be considered.
1.1 This practice addresses how various test methods and data analyses can be used to develop models for the evaluation of the long-term alteration behavior of materials used in engineered barrier system (EBS) for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and other high-level nuclear waste in a geologic repository. The alteration behavior of waste forms and EBS materials is important because it affects the retention of radionuclides within the disposal system either directly, as in the case of waste forms in which the radionuclides are initially immobilized, or indirectly, as in the case of EBS containment materials that restrict the ingress of groundwater or the egress of radionuclides that are released as the waste forms degrade.
1.2 The purpose of this practice is to provide a scientifically-based strategy for developing models that can be used to estimate material alteration behavior after a repository is permanently closed (that is, the post-closure period) because the timescales involved with geological disposal preclude direct validation of predictions.
1.3 This practice also addresses uncertainties in materials behavior models and the impact on the confidence in the EBS design criteria, the scientific bases of alteration models, and repository performance assessments using those models. This includes the identification and use of conservative assumptions to address uncertainty in the long-term performance of materials.
1.3.1 Steps involved in evaluating the performance of waste forms and EBS materials include problem definition, laboratory and field testing, modeling of individual and coupled processes, and model confirmation.
1.3.2 The estimates of waste form and EBS material performance are based on models derived from theoretical considerations, expert judgments, and interpretations of data obtained from tests and analyses of appropriate analogs.
1.3.3 For the purpose of this practice, tests are categorized according to the information they provide and how it is used for model development, support, and use. These tests may include but are not limited to: accelerated tests, attribute tests, characterization tests, confirmation tests, and service condition tests.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents (purchase separately) The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
C859 Terminology Relating to Nuclear Materials
C1285 Test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear, Hazardous, and Mixed Waste Glasses and Multiphase Glass Ceramics: The Product Consistency Test (PCT)
C1682 Guide for Characterization of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Support of Interim Storage, Transportation and Geologic Repository Disposal
E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
E178 Practice for Dealing With Outlying Observations
E583 Practice for Systematizing the Development of (ASTM) Voluntary Consensus Standards for the Solution of Nuclear and Other Complex Problems
U.S. Government DocumentsCode of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 63, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, latest revision NUREG–0856, Final Technical Position on Documentation of Computer Codes for High-Level Waste Management (1983) Public Law 97-425, Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended
International DocumentsFinland Government Decree (736/2008) IAEA GSG-3 The Safety Case and Safety Assessment for the Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria 2013 SKI Report 99:2 Regulatory Perspectives on Model Validation in High-Level Radioactive Waste Programs: A Joint NRC/SKI White Paper, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, March 1999 Available from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria, www.iaea.org.
ICS Number Code 13.030.30 (Special wastes)
|Link to Active (This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.)|
ASTM C1174-17, Standard Practice for Evaluation of the Long-Term Behavior of Materials Used in Engineered Barrier Systems (EBS) for Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, www.astm.orgBack to Top