You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Roll Fatigue Tests of Forged ZK60A-T5 Magnesium and 2014-T6 Aluminum Wheels

    Published: 01 January 1966

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (604K) 11 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (6.5M) 207 $64   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Fifteen forged ZK60A-T5 magnesium wheels and four forged 2014-T6 aluminum wheels were roll tested at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in a cooperative wheel-test program with The Dow Metal Products Co. Magnesium wheels were modified F104 wheels which were redesigned to reduce roll life from over 1000 miles to about 100 miles at a load of 10,000 1b. A load versus roll-life scatter band was established by testing 12 magnesium wheels at loads ranging from 6500 to 12,500 lb. Three aluminum wheels, which were thinner but still 20 per cent heavier than the magnesium wheels, had roll lives comparable to the magnesium wheels; it is concluded that a magnesium wheel can be about 20 per cent lighter than an aluminum wheel and have the same life expectancy. Strain was measured at various locations in wheels being roll tested, and the variation with tire inflation pressure and rolling load was determined. The site of fatigue crack initiation (bead-seat radius) is strained well into the plastic range under normal roll test conditions. Wheel roll lives and strains measured at the bead-seat radius were found to depend upon the ply rating of the tire mounted on the wheels and also upon whether tubes were used in the tires.


    fatigue (materials), aluminum alloys, magnesium alloys, wheels, aircraft, rolling fatigue, corrosion, landing gear, tires

    Author Information:

    Behr, R. D.
    Research and development engineer, The Dow Metal Products Co., Division of The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Mich.

    Campbell, S.
    Mechanical engineering technician, AFFDL, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.03

    DOI: 10.1520/STP48346S