You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    BRE Environmental Profiles: Past, Present, and Future

    Published: 01 January 2009

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (472K) 6 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (4.5M) 121 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Environmental conservation and the impact that the construction industry has on the environment have risen to the fore as a principle against which materials, products, specifications, and whole building fabric must be considered. The reasoning for this is sound, with the industry being responsible for the manufacture and use of hundreds of millions of tons of materials annually. At a national level in the UK alone the construction products sector is responsible for around 10 & [DEFRA statistics, 2000] of all carbon emissions. Against this background, the sector is remarkably well placed to build from work already done to develop standardized Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approaches and to apply them to construction scenarios. As a result, the practice is now well established and has gained a growing momentum across all construction stakeholders, from clients to product suppliers.This paper examines BRE's experience in the field having originally developed an LCA approach called the “Environmental Profiles methodology” and used it to create an information database, specification tools, and a proprietary product certification scheme. The next phase of development is critical to the continuing success of these programs.


    environmental profiles, EPDs, building assessment, LCA

    Author Information:

    Steele, K.
    BRE, Watford,

    Anderson, J.
    BRE, Watford,

    Committee/Subcommittee: E06.71

    DOI: 10.1520/STP47524S