You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Survey of Techniques for the Evaluation of the Fire Resistance Properties of Aviation Hydraulic Fluids

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (388K) 26 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (3.5M) 199 $67   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Five types of aviation hydraulic fluid were examined — mineral, snuffer, phosphate ester, siloxane, and chlorosilicone.

    Statistics show that more aircraft accidents are associated with wheel brakes than with any other components. A hot brake test simulating conditions that could develop from a fractured hydraulic pipe during braking revealed little difference in the ignitability of phosphate esters, mineral type and a snuffer fluid D.

    Only one fluid, a snuffer fluid C, withstood ignition with brake heat pack temperature of 700C.

    Several well known simpler laboratory techniques were used. Of these a combined high pressure spray/manifold test not only gave a reasonable degree of correlation with the hot brake test results, but also differentiated between the degree of flame propagation evidenced by these fluids.

    The shape of the nozzle in the spray tests influenced results whilst fluid temperature and pressure were found to have generally little significant effect.


    fire resistance, fire tests, flammability, hydraulic fluids

    Author Information:

    Alan, R.
    Chemist-in-Charge, Castrol Limited, Bracknell, Berkshire

    Ker, C.
    Chemist-in-Charge, Castrol Limited, Bracknell, Berkshire

    Committee/Subcommittee: D02.N0

    DOI: 10.1520/STP44661S