You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Two-Stage Acceptance Sampling by Attributes

    Published: 01 January 1952

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (348K) 16 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (1.6M) 72 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Certain types of food products, such as dried fruits and nuts, are presented for inspection in lots of one or two hundred to several thousand boxes or bags, each box or bag containing a large number of individual items. The quality of a lot is measured by the proportion of defective items contained in the aggregate, but the labor cost of locating, opening, and sampling a box or bag is generally many times that of inspecting an individual item, dictating inspection of the maximum possible number of items from the minimum number of boxes. The distribution of defectives between boxes may however be nonuniform, so that the frequency distribution of the number of defectives occurring in a fixed number of items from randomly chosen boxes is not binomial. In some such instances, the distribution may be satisfactorily representable by a negative hypergeometric frequency function which allows a greater variance than would the binomial. A minimum-cost two-stage single sampling plan for the classification of good and bad quality lots, with specified risks of error calculated from this distribution, is described, boxes or bags constituting the primary sampling units and individual items the secondary sampling units.

    Author Information:

    Dunnett, C. W.
    Statistician, Food and Drug Divisions, Ottawa,

    Hopkins, J. W.
    Biometrician, Division of Applied Biology, National Research Council, Ottawa,

    Committee/Subcommittee: E11.02

    DOI: 10.1520/STP43980S