You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Committee D-19: The First Quarter Century

    Published: 01 January 1957

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (112K) 6 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (1.2M) 58 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The word “committee” is unhappy; it tends to have unfavorable connotations. For instance, a whimsical definition of committee is: “A group of persons who individually can do nothing and collectively agree that nothing can be done.”Recognizing this stigma, or perhaps contributing to it, was the report of an extensive study published by a research institution soon after World War II. By statistical means this purportedly scholarly investigation reached the dismaying conclusion that the optimum size for a committee was 0.7 member.

    Author Information:

    Adams, RC
    Superintendent, Chemical Engineering Laboratory, U. S. Naval Engineering Experiment Station, Annapolis, Md.

    Committee/Subcommittee: D19.90

    DOI: 10.1520/STP39281S