You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Validity of the Slow Straining Test Method in the Stress Corrosion Cracking Research Compared with Conventional Testing Techniques

    Published: 01 January 1979

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (216K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (7.9M) 438 $118   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The appearance of a minimum in the susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking (SCC)/strain-rate curves obtained by slow strain-rate experiments has been examined carefully and a relationship between the repassivation rate of the material under investigation and the position of this minimum has been established.

    For aluminum alloys, the results of the slow strain-rate experiments are not in complete agreement with the results of the conventional testing techniques. To explain this behavior, further experiments have to be carried out. At this moment, it seems to be doubtful whether the slow strain-rate testing technique is applicable to aluminum alloys.

    The results with titanium alloys and high alloyed chromium- and chromium-nickel stainless steels obtained with different testing techniques (slow strain rate and constant load) are in very good agreement with each other.


    stress corrosion cracking, tests, passivity

    Author Information:

    Buhl, H
    Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt E. V., Institut für Werkstoff-Forschung, Köln,

    Committee/Subcommittee: G01.06

    DOI: 10.1520/STP38125S