You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    The Relative Density Approach—Uses, Testing Requirements, Reliability, and Shortcomings

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (216K) 13 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (9.1M) 506 $127   ADD TO CART


    To evaluate the density of free draining cohesionless soils in terms of percent relative density, there are three parameters that must be determined. These are (1) the minimum density that the soil can be structured, (2) the maximum density that the soil can be structured, and (3) the density of the soil being evaluated. Errors or variations can be obtained in determining each of these three values. The reasons for such variations include (1) lack of specimen similarity, (2) dissimilar test procedures used, (3) testing equipment not similar or not properly maintained, and variations in the training and expertise of operator. The results of a large number of tests by numerous laboratories indicate that the variations associated with the minimum and maximum density tests are about the same as those associated with the impact compaction tests. The requirement for determination of three parameters to determine the relative density value can lead to the compounding of errors and variations in the worst cases. The use of proper test methods, closely followed; specified equipment, well maintained; well trained test personnel, and care in sampling should provide reproducible relative density values within 10 percent relative density.


    cohesionless soils, density (mass/volume), tests, soils, reproducibility, soil compacting, reliability, soil mechanics

    Author Information:

    Holtz, WG
    Consulting civil engineer, and former assistant chief, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Wheat Ridge, Colo.

    Committee/Subcommittee: D18.92

    DOI: 10.1520/STP37861S