You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Effects of Dispersant Use on Shore Life

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (200K) 13 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (4.8M) 316 $97   ADD TO CART


    Damage to Cornish seashore life resulting from the chemical dispersal of oil spilled from Torrey Canyon is often taken as typical of dispersant use, although primitive mixtures were badly misapplied there. Where more modern dispersants are used with care, as in recent Milford Haven spills, serious consequences can be avoided. All effective dispersants offer some biological hazards, especially to sedentary or planktonic filter-feeding animals, which are not revealed by short-term acute toxicity testing. Spilled oil should therefore be removed mechanically wherever possible. Careful spraying is recommended to prevent an oil slick reaching the shore and to protect seabird colonies. It may also be necessary on rocky or built-up amenity areas but should be avoided on coasts rarely visited by humans and distant from bird colonies. Spraying may worsen matters on sandy shores, while any form of treatment will further damage oiled salt marshes.


    oil spills, dispersants, seashores, coastal conservation (beaches, salt marshes, cliff vegetation, bird colonies), marine life (worms, molluscs, crustaceans, fish, seabirds, plankton, algae, lichens), ecology, filter-feeding, bioassay, toxicity, fishing, tourism, water sports, disaster contingency planning, oils

    Author Information:

    Nelson-Smith, A
    Senior lecturer in zoology, University College of Swansea, South Wales

    Committee/Subcommittee: F20.11

    DOI: 10.1520/STP35725S