You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Improving Efficacy Testing of Bird-Repellent Seed Treatments

    Published: 01 June 1979

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (364K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (5.3M) 319 $99   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    To overcome certain deficiencies in field evaluation of chemical repellents used to protect corn seed from birds, a test procedure was developed in which half of each test plot was exposed to birds and half was protected by bird-tight wire mesh. This arrangement isolated the effects of bird attack from the effects of the chemical on germination and on insects and diseases of seeds and sprouts. Bird pressure was controlled by enclosing all plots with netting, and placing the birds inside. Repellency under the conditions set for a test was the “covered-minus-uncovered difference” in sprouts or sprout damage in treated plots compared with the “coveredminus-uncovered difference” in untreated plots. The results of several small-plot tests (both open and enclosed) with six candidate repellents indicated that reliable economical tests can be conducted under conditions of controlled soil and moisture and under various intensities of bird attack, to yield accurate information, heretofore unavailable, on the performance of bird repellents.


    vertebrate pest control, chemical repellent, repellent test protocol, enclosure tests, efficacy tests, bird damage, sprout and seed damage, corn damage by birds

    Author Information:

    Linehan, JT
    Research biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research Center, and the Department of Entomology and Applied Ecology, University of Delaware, Newark, Del

    Committee/Subcommittee: E35.17

    DOI: 10.1520/STP34977S