You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    STP862

    The Need for Hierarchical Standards for Automated Integrated Manufacturing

    Published: 01 January 1985


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (164K) 13 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (4.2M) 253 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Abstract

    Industrial leaders are being challenged to automate or face the consequences of losing competitive markets to more automated competition. The implication is that future profits will be related to the degree of automation. Technology can support this automation today, but can modernization support tomorrow's technology? Without a set of standards in support of an integrated approach to automation, the automating pioneer may be committing the company to technical obsolescence or continued capital investment. This paper calls for development of an integrated set of standards in support of automation that will ensure a modernization capability through implementation of new technology.

    This paper describes a matrix approach to the development of hierarchical standards based on (1) ASTM standards for computerized systems, (2) the application of Military Standard MIL-STD 881A on Work Breakdown Structures to automated integrated manufacturing, and (3) the International Standards Organization reference model of open system interconnection.

    A call is made for ASTM to take the lead in the following areas: (1) the development of functional requirements for an integrated set of standards, (2) the tasking, support, and coordination necessary for the development of these standards, (3) the dissemination of the standards, (4) the development of evaluation methods for testing compatibility and interoperability of new technology in compliance with this integrated set of standards, and (5) the implementation and utilization of an electronic mail/information network technology to shorten the time needed to develop standards by consensus.

    Keywords:

    ISO open systems, CAD/CAM standards


    Author Information:

    Berkley, JB
    President, CAD/CAM Integration Inc., San Diego, CA


    Committee/Subcommittee: E31.03

    DOI: 10.1520/STP34226S