You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Statistical Inconsistencies in the Use of No-Observed-Effect Levels in Toxicity Testing

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (164K) 11 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (6.2M) 467 $55   ADD TO CART


    Use of the no-observed-effect level (NOEL) as an experimental end point violates the principle of negative inference, the logical basis of statistical hypothesis testing. The NOEL is based on the nonrejection of the hypothesis of no toxic effect, whereas scientific methods stress conclusions based on the rejection of a hypothesis. Failure to reject this hypothesis may result either because the concentration is “safe” or because the experimental protocol to detect a toxic response is insensitive, but the cause is indeterminant and the error rate unknown. The lowest rejected concentration tested (LRCT) is recommended as an experimental end point. By the use of LRCT the rate of misclassification is known and is equal to α. Experimental designs that emphasize both the biological and the statistical significance of LRCT end points are recommended.


    aquatic toxicology, hazard assessment, statistical methods, data analysis, bioassays, acute tests, chronic tests

    Author Information:

    Skalski, JR
    Research scientist, Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Wash.

    Committee/Subcommittee: D19.02

    DOI: 10.1520/STP34169S