You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Spreading Resistance : A Comparison of Sampling Volume Correction Factors in High Resolution Quantitative Spreading Resistance

    Published: 01 January 1987

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (252K) 19 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (9.4M) 699 $70   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The development of fine geometry devices requires a greater depth of understanding of dopant incorporation mechanisms and the subsequent location of carriers. Spreading resistance is an accepted method for determining carrier concentration profiles. The deconvolution of these profiles from the raw spreading resistance data is a crucial step which uses so called sampling volume correction factors. These are complex and difficult to evaluate but a number of algorithms are available which attempt the necessary integrations and iterations. Five of these algorithms are reviewed and their accuracy and performance are evaluated on real (as opposed to model) data. The need for new methods of data smoothing is highlighted and it is concluded that the so called Berkowitz-Lux algorithm is currently the most successful available.


    Profiling, spreading resistance, sampling volume correction factors, correction factors, carrier concentration profiles

    Author Information:

    Pawlik, M
    Department Head, Silicon Materials and Characterisation, GEC Research Limited, Hirst Research Centre, Wembley, Middlesex

    Committee/Subcommittee: F01.06

    DOI: 10.1520/STP25785S