You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Use of On-Site Soil Vapor Analysis in UST Site Assessments: A Summary of Results at 635 Sites

    Published: 01 January 1993

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (328K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (4.4M) 233 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Over six hundred sites in the state of Iowa were evaluated for hydrocarbon contamination associated with underground storage and delivery systems. Driven probe technology was used to obtain the soil vapor samples which where analyzed on-site using a field mobilized, laboratory grade gas chromatograph. A hydrocarbon concentration of 1000 (μg/l in the soil gas had been established as an action level for state assisted cleanup. This action level proved to be conservative. Approximately 72% of the sites were at or above this action level. The pattern of hydrocarbon distribution was found to be affected by three physical site properties. As was expected, concentration readings increased with depth and as groundwater was approached. Higher readings were obtained under pavement vs under unpaved areas. High hydrocarbon concentrations were not a reliable indicator of leakage. Of the sites which passed a tightness test, hydrocarbon concentrations in the soil gas approached saturation at 70% of the sites. However, low hydrocarbon concentration was a better indication of system tightness. Only 8% of the sites with low levels of hydrocarbons failed a system tightness test. Relative soil permeability remained fairly constant down to approximately 7 feet (2.1 meters) where it began to increase due to the proximity to groundwater in the capillary fringe.


    soil gas, site assessment, UST, hydrocarbon contamination, field analytical methods, Iowa

    Author Information:

    Golding, RD
    Special Projects Director, Tracer Research Corporation, Tucson, Arizona

    Wichman, TA
    Research Assistant, Tracer Research Corporation, Tucson, Arizona

    Committee/Subcommittee: E50.01

    DOI: 10.1520/STP25087S