You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    STP1156

    Effects of Stress Ratio on Edge Delamination Characteristics in Laminated Composites

    Published: 0


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (388K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (18M) 653 $147   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Abstract

    The effects of stress ratio on delamination onset behavior under cyclic loading was investigated in AS4/3502 [+/-252/90]s graphite/epoxy laminates. For the purpose of this study, delamination onset was defined as a delamination 5% of the laminate width. The resulting data showed definite changes in delamination behavior between stress ratios (R ratio) of 0.1 and 0.5.

    For maximum amplitude stresses below about 80% of the static delamination stress, delamination onset occurred later at R = 0.5 than for R = 0.1. Also for the corresponding Gmax, delamination growth rates at delamination onset were slower for R = 0.5 than for R = 0.1. This was reflected in changes of power law exponent from 10.2 for R = 0.1 to 31.6 for R = 0.5 and the constant from 1.10 × 10-2 for R = 0.1 to 254 for R = 0.5.

    Fractographic analysis suggested that the failure mode, which appeared to be predominantly Mode I, remained unchanged; however, the density of shallow hackles was greater for R = 0.1 than for R = 0.5. This presumably was due to a more rapid coalescence of microcracks which was consistent with the larger crack opening displacements for R = 0.1.

    Keywords:

    composites, damage tolerance, durability, edge delamination, graphite/epoxy, fatigue, stress ratio


    Author Information:

    Scrivner, GC
    Graduate student, Material Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX

    Chan, WS
    Associate professor, Center for Composite MaterialsUniversity of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX


    Committee/Subcommittee: D30.04

    DOI: 10.1520/STP24749S