You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Quantitative Comparison and Evaluation of Various Notch Machining Methods and How They Affect ASTM E23 and ISO R442 Testing Equipment Results

    Published: 01 January 1990

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (748K) 26 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (3.8M) 211 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The differences obtained when conducting Charpy impact tests using an ASTM method E23 specification, versus the ISO type impact tester have been reported with little agreement upon the comparisons. There has also been historically much controversy as far as the proper method of machining the notch into the Charpy specimen. This paper compares the effects of the two different types of impact testing equipment and evaluates machining of the notch by the methods of grinding, broaching and milling with a single toothed fly cutter.

    It was determined that results obtained with the ISO type impact machine were elevated by approximately 4%. It was also determined that a slightly lower impact value was obtained with broached specimens. Photomicrographs of typical notch profiles were also obtained.


    Charpy impact testing, notching, machining methods, impact testing

    Author Information:

    Fink, DA
    Project Engineermember of the AWS A5 Filler Metal CommitteeChairman of the AWS A50 and A5P Subcommittees on Consumables, The Lincoln Electric Companygas metal arc, electroslag and electrogas welding, Cleveland, Ohio

    Committee/Subcommittee: E28.08

    DOI: 10.1520/STP24141S