You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    The Significance of Sliding Mode Crack Closure on Mode III Fatigue Crack Growth

    Published: 01 January 1988

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (400K) 19 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (7.9M) 385 $110   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    During Mode III loading, the surfaces of a crack move parallel to each other; friction, abrasion, and mutual support of the contacting parts of the microscopically rough crack faces result. These energy-dissipative processes reduce the effective load at the crack tip, a phenomenon known as “sliding mode crack closure” (SMCC). This effect has been studied by performing crack growth experiments on circumferentially notched specimens of high-strength (AISI 4340) and mild steel (AISI C1018) under pure cyclic torsion and under combined loading (cyclic Mode III + static Mode I). Crack growth rates without the influence of sliding mode crack closure (“true” crack growth rates) can be determined using an extrapolation procedure. These crack growth rates are independent of crack depth, specimen diameter, and loading level and are therefore a material characteristic for Mode III fatigue crack growth. With the aid of the “true” crack growth curve the extent of sliding mode crack closure can be quantitatively determined and the changes in fracture mode explained. By superimposing a static tensile load the sliding mode crack closure is reduced whereas the “true” crack growth rates are only slightly influenced.


    fatigue crack growth, Mode III, complex loading, mixed-mode loading, torsional loading, crack closure, fractography

    Author Information:

    Tschegg, EK
    Associate professor, Technical University, Vienna,

    Stanzl, SE
    Associate professor, University of Vienna, Vienna,

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.06

    DOI: 10.1520/STP23218S