You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    A Comparison of Techniques Used to Assess the Thermal Burden of Protective Clothing

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (196K) 11 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (5.9M) 359 $76   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The majority of test methods available to assess the thermal burden imposed by protective clothing on a subject are used in isolation with little in the way of correlation between them reported. This paper directly compares some of the data obtained on a limited number of protective clothing systems from a range of tests including the Control Dish, Togmeter, two variants of the Skin Model, both Sweating and Thermal Manikins and, most importantly, human subjects. Correlations drawn between the methods show that even the simplest methods give a means of assessing the potential physiological burden of a protective clothing system worn under selected environmental conditions and work rates. The actual temperature profiles of subjects are compared to those predicted by a mathematical model using laboratory data and are shown to be in good agreement.


    Water vapour transmission, Thermal resistance, Togmeter, Control Dish, Skin Model, Manikin

    Author Information:

    Williams, JT
    Doctor, De Montfort University, Leicester,

    Committee/Subcommittee: F23.96

    DOI: 10.1520/STP19912S