You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Evaluation of the Protective Performance of Fabrics and Fabric Combinations Against Molten Iron

    Published: 01 January 1997

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (212K) 13 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (5.9M) 359 $76   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The protective performance against molten metal has commonly been measured for the outer layers of garments. Heavy-weight wool melton offers the best overall protection against molten metal owing to its metal-shedding property coupled with high thermal insulation. Reflective aluminized materials, which also protect against radiant heat, have been found to give good protection against molten metal. In normal use, however, these materials have limited use because of their stiffness, tight weave, and impermeable construction. Many flame-retardant cotton fabrics also offer protection against molten iron to some degree. In this study the protective performance of fabric combinations of garment materials, for 8 hours use, was evaluated. The performance against flame spread and molten iron was measured for various flame-retardant outerlayer fabrics and fabric combinations with non-flame retardant and flame retardant underwear fabrics. With all inner layers the molten iron classification increased, regardless of whether the material was flame-retardant or not, synthetic or not. If the outer layer was thick enough, the combination passed also the flame spread test, but with thinner outer layers, hole was formed in the inner layer. The results from the laboratory tests showed that protection can be increased conciderably, from class 1 (60–120 g iron) to class 3 (over 201 g iron), if flame-retardant underwear is used under flame-retardant cotton outer fabric. The material combination is still comfortable enough for eight-hours use.


    protective clothing, molten iron, fabric combinations

    Author Information:

    Mäkinen, H
    Senior Researcher, Institute of Occupational Health, Vantaa,

    Laiho, H
    Assistant Researcher, Institute of Occupational Health, Vantaa,

    Pajunen, P
    Research engineer, Institute of Occupational Health, Vantaa,

    Committee/Subcommittee: F23.96

    DOI: 10.1520/STP19906S