You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Semirigid Pavements: A Dead Loss for Backcalculation Procedures Using Deflection Bowls?

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (268K) 16 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (14M) 695 $109   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Nondestructive pavement testing by way of dynamic deflection measurements with, for example, a falling weight deflectometer (FWD) is a widely accepted procedure the world over.

    The measured deflection bowl can be used as an overall yardstick for the structural condition of the pavement. However, when the deflection bowl is used for the determination of the moduli, major errors can be made, especially when using backcalculation procedures. In the case of semirigid pavements (or, in general, of pavements where the modulus of the base is of the same order as the modulus of the upper layer), the deflection bowl does not provide all the information required for the separate calculation of the right moduli for the asphalt layer and the bound base layer.

    It is recommended to determine the modulus of the asphalt layer or base layer by other (for example, laboratory) tests and to use this modulus as a fixed value in the backcalculation procedure. However, precautions should be taken if cracks are present in the layer(s).


    falling weight deflectometer, backcalculation procedure, semirigid pavements, deflection bowl

    Author Information:

    Pronk, AC
    Technical-scientific staff member, Ministry of Transport and Public Works, Delft,

    Committee/Subcommittee: D04.39

    DOI: 10.1520/STP19821S