You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Threshold Sensitivities of Tests to Detect Oil Film Contamination in Oxygen Equipment

    Published: 01 January 1986

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (132K) 8 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (3.5M) 243 $62   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Equipment and components for use in an oxygen service are required to be “clean” or “free from oil,” as contamination by oil is believed to have been responsible for numerous incidents. In some specifications, cleanness is defined by stating the maximum allowable concentration in grams per square metre, but often the specification is qualitative. Four tests of cleanness are widely quoted; these are visual examination in white and in ultraviolet light, a wipe test, and a water break test. The threshold sensitivities of these four tests have been evaluated for six different hydrocarbon oils commonly used in the industry. The results of this limited project show that under the test conditions the order of increasing sensitivity was white light, ultraviolet (UV) light, modified wipe, and water break. Water break was 20 to 40 times more sensitive than the white light test. Considerable further investigation is recommended.


    oxygen, equipment, oils, detection, tests, safety, cleanness, contamination, cleanliness

    Author Information:

    Gilbertson, JA
    Group technical manager-Gases, The BOC Group Plc, London,

    Lowrie, R
    Senior research metallurgist, The BOC Group Inc., Group Technical Center, Murray Hill, NJ

    Committee/Subcommittee: G04.01

    DOI: 10.1520/STP19318S