You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Comparison of Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Techniques

    Published: 01 January 1990

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (376K) 22 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (13M) 611 $132   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The first part of this paper reviews the adequacy of simple estimation procedures for predicting the crack growth and failure behavior of cracked structures. These simple methods include: J-estimation schemes (where five different schemes are presented including two new methods), the R6 approach, and the VR-curve technique. The second part of the paper discusses methods for predicting elastic-plastic fracture under conditions where the simple schemes are not applicable. This includes a discussion of integral parameters, mainly focusing on the T*-integral, and the local (or damage) based approaches. These two approaches are required where the degradation near a crack tip depends on the history of damage accumulation.


    integral parameters, T, *, J, -integral, estimation schemes, R6, VR, -curve, local approach, damage, crack growth, elastic-plastic, fracture, history dependence, cracked pipe

    Author Information:

    Brust, FW
    Battelle Columbus Division, Columbus, OH

    Nakagaki, M
    Kyushu Institute of Technology, Iizuka-City,

    Gilles, P
    Framatome, Paris,

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.08

    DOI: 10.1520/STP19008S