You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    STP1029

    Matching Building Performance to Organizational Needs

    Published: 01 January 1990


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (412K) 22 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (5.0M) 309 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Abstract

    A standard practice for measuring the office building requirements of organizations and the performance of buildings in meeting those requirements (ORBIT-2) is described. Using this method four alternative strategies for meeting an organizations building needs, current and future, are examined. These strategies include maximizing building performance, striking an average, maximizing a few demands stereotypically associated with an organization type, and carefully matching the building performance profile to the needs profile of a particular organization. Building requirements for five very different organizations are also compared against the performance of a representative sample of 20 North American office buildings using the ORBIT-2 process.

    There is no such thing as a universally ideal building — “one size does not fit all”. A building can fail to meet organizational needs by overperformance thus wasting resources through unneeded and unused capacity, or by underperforming which negatively affects organizational effectiveness.

    Keywords:

    office buildings, building performance, building appraisal, organizational needs, building needs, building requirements


    Author Information:

    Sims, WR
    professors of facility planning and management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

    Becker, FD
    professors of facility planning and management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York


    Committee/Subcommittee: E06.21

    DOI: 10.1520/STP18947S