You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Two Energy-Efficient Office Buildings

    Published: 01 January 1990

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (244K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (5.0M) 309 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    A post-occupancy evaluation was made of two energy-efficient office buildings four years after initial occupancy. Building operators, owners, engineers and architects were interviewed to understand how decisions were made that ultimately affected the energy performance of the two buildings. Tenants were surveyed to assess their satisfaction with their work environment. Findings from the study have shown how different goals and expectations on the part of the principal players led to decisions that have influenced major aspects of the buildings' performance. Interior designers and tenants have negated the energy-saving potential of the daylighting, marketing staff have altered the window characteristics, building operators have operated the building on schedules different from those envisioned by the designers, and building code officials have restricted tenant use of the atria. While many of the findings are specific to these two buildings, the general findings are applicable to office buildings in general, specifically that the operation and use of the building are often more important than the design in determining the overall performance.


    office buildings, energy-efficient design, daylighting, occupant effects, operation and maintenance, post-occupancy evaluation

    Author Information:

    Diamond, RC
    Staff Scientist, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California

    Committee/Subcommittee: E06.21

    DOI: 10.1520/STP18944S