You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Evaluation and Significance of Fracture Toughness in Ceramic Materials

    Published: 01 January 1995

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (220K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (17M) 834 $109   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Fracture toughness tests of several ceramic materials were carried out according to the various test methods, that is the Bridge indentation(BI, SEPB), Fatigue precrack(FP), Controlled surface flaw(CSF), Chevron notch(CN) and Indentation fracture(IF) methods. Mutual comparison of the test results was made to discuss the validity and applicability of the each test method. Significance of the apparent fracture toughness with stable crack growth was discussed. The intrinsic fracture toughness can be obtained by the CSF method, in which a small surface crack is used. At high temperatures, since nonlinear deformation due to softening of glass phase and stable crack growth occur, nonlinear fracture mechanics approach should be applied. JIC-value is successfully evaluated according to the R-curve method.


    fracture toughness, test method, ceramics, stable crack growth, high temperature, R-curve

    Author Information:

    Mutoh, Y
    Professor, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka-shi,

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.09

    DOI: 10.1520/STP16400S