You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Effects of 3-D Transverse Constraint on the Evolution of In-Plane Q-Stress

    Published: 01 January 1995

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (304K) 18 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (17M) 834 $109   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    This study examines the limits of validity of the Q ≈ 0 assumption under monotonic loading along the crack front in the “high constraint” 2-in.- and 4-in.-thick 4T-planform CT specimen geometries. Preliminary results indicate that progressive deviation of the in-plane crack-tip fields from Q ≈ 0 occurs with increasing load, along the crack front up to the symmetry plane of the geometries. The nature of the in-plane deviation can be described using J-Q theory. Significantly, no indication of possible 3-D transverse loss-of-constraint effects on the crack-tip fields is manifested in a 2-D plane strain analysis of the 4T-planform geometry. Uniformity of J or K values along the crack front does not imply either the existence of single-parameter-dominant conditions or the absence of substantial 3-D variations in the in-plane crack-tip fields. Preliminary results also suggest that current KIc-related size requirements in ASTM-E399 might be sufficient to preclude the onset of significant 3-D transverse Q-stress effects for the 4-in.-thick geometry. However, significant deviation from J-dominant conditions could occur within the existing JIc- and JR-related size requirements in ASTM-E813 and ASTM-E1152 for both geometries.


    J-Q theory, crack-tip constraint, fracture toughness, crack-tip fields, small-scale yielding, CT, warm prestress

    Author Information:

    Shum, DKM
    Research Associate, Saint-Gobain/Norton Industrial Ceramics Corporation, Northboro, MA

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.08

    DOI: 10.1520/STP16384S