You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    How Fatigue Cracks Grow, Interact with Microstructure, and Lose Similitude

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (296K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (14M) 635 $206   ADD TO CART


    This paper reviews the processes by which fatigue cracks grow and interact with applied load and microstructure. Fatigue crack growth processes are remarkably similar irrespective of microstructure, crack size, or nature of the loading. Large strains at fatigue crack tips applied over repeated cycles severely alter, or homogenize, microstructures, followed by crack advance. Microstructure affects fatigue crack growth kinetics more than growth processes. But, under marginal conditions, fatigue crack growth rates are also affected by microstructural features. Examples are small cracks growing under low stresses or large cracks growing near threshold.

    The prediction of safe lifetimes for machine parts, such as gas turbine components, requires that laboratory-generated fatigue crack growth rate data be transferred to field-operating conditions. This transfer depends on the maintenance of similitude: microstructurely, mechanically, and environmentally. However, for many industrially important conditions, similitude with large fatigue crack growth is lost, partially because of changes in fatigue crack closure. The effect of closure on similitude is discussed.

    New data are presented to illustrate the loss of similitude between applied loading and crack tip strain response. The resulting strain rates of material within the process zone are unexpected. Environmentally influenced fatigue crack growth rates are likely to be influenced by these strain rates.


    fatigue crack growth, microstructure, crack tip plastic zone, fracture mechanics, threshold stress intensity factor

    Author Information:

    Davidson, DL
    Institute scientist, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.06

    DOI: 10.1520/STP16239S