You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Comparison of the Long-Time Corrosion Behavior of Certain Zr Alloys in PWR, BWR, and Laboratory Tests

    Published: 01 January 1996

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (304K) 15 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (24M) 898 $256   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Laboratory corrosion tests have always been an important tool for Zr alloy development and optimization. However, it must be known whether a test is representative for the application in-reactor. To shed more light on this question, coupons of several Zr alloys were exposed under isothermal conditions in all or most of the following environments: In-Reactor: (1) PWR core at 300 to 340°C up to six years. (2) BWR core with a low sensitivity to nodular corrosion up to four years. (3) BWR core with a high sensitivity to nodular corrosion up to two years.

    Ex-Reactor (in Autoclave): (1) 350°C/pressurized water up to three years. (2) 400°C/100-bar steam up to two years. (3) 350°C/0.01 M LiOH water up to two years. (4) 500 to 515°C/high-pressure steam 16 to 24 h.

    In addition, the material condition of several of the examined Zr alloys was varied over a wide range.

    For evaluation of the in-PWR tests and for comparison of out-of-pile and in-pile tests, the different temperatures and times were normalized to a temperature-independent “normalized time” by assuming an activation temperature (Q/R) of 14 200 K. Comparison of in-PWR and out-of-pile corrosion behavior of Zircaloy shows that corrosion deviates to higher values in PWR if a weight gain of about 50 mg/dm2 is exceeded. In the case of the Zr2.5Nb alloy, a slight deviation of corrosion as compared to laboratory results starts in PWR only above a weight gain of 100 mg/dm2. In BWR, corrosion of Zircaloy is enhanced early in time if compared with out-of-pile. Zr2.5Nb exhibits higher corrosion results in BWR than Zircaloy-4.

    Alloying chemistry and material condition affect corrosion of Zr alloys. However, several of the material parameters have shown a different ranking in the different environments. Nevertheless, several material parameters influencing in-reactor corrosion like the second phase particle (SPP) size or in-PWR behavior as the Sn and Fe content can be optimized by out-of-pile corrosion tests.


    zirconium alloys, Zircaloy, corrosion, in-PWR corrosion, in-BWR corrosion, out-of-pile corrosion, neutron irradiation, radiation effects, nuclear application

    Author Information:

    Garzarolli, F
    Siemens AG, Power Generation Group (KWU), Erlangen,

    Broy, Y
    Siemens AG, Power Generation Group (KWU), Erlangen,

    Busch, RA
    Siemens Power Corporation, Richland, Washington

    Committee/Subcommittee: B10.01

    DOI: 10.1520/STP16204S