You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Corrosion Behavior of Duplex and Reference Cladding in NPP Grohnde

    Published: 01 January 1996

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (868K) 20 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (24M) 898 $256   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The Nuclear Fuel Industry Research (NFIR) Group undertook a lead test assembly (LTA) program in NPP Grohnde PWR in Germany to assess the corrosion performance of duplex and reference (i.e., non-duplex) cladding. Two identical 16 by 16 LTAs, each containing 32 peripheral test rods, completed four reactor cycles, reaching a peak rod burnup of 46 MWd/kgU. The results from poolside examinations performed at the end of each cycle, together with power histories and coolant chemistry, are reported.

    Five different cladding materials [three types of duplex (D1-D3) and two types of reference (R1, R2)] were characterized during fabrication. The corrosion performance of the cladding materials was tracked in long-term tests (∼900 days) in high-pressure, high-temperature autoclaves. The relative ranking of corrosion behavior in such tests corresponded well with the inreactor corrosion performance. The extent and distribution of hydriding in duplex and reference specimens during the autoclave testing has been characterized.

    The in-reactor corrosion data indicate that the low-tin (1.3% Sn) Zircaloy-4 reference cladding, R2, had an improved corrosion resistance compared to high-tin (1.5% Sn) Zircaloy-4 reference cladding, R1. Two types of duplex cladding, D1 (Zr-2.5% Nb) and D2 (Zr-0.4% Fe-0.5% Sn), showed an even further improvement in corrosion resistance compared to R2 cladding. The third duplex cladding, D3 (Zr-4 + 1.0% Nb), had significantly less corrosion resistance, which was inferior to R1. The in-reactor and out-reactor corrosion performances have been ranked.


    corrosion, zirconium alloys, fuel cladding, in-reactor performance, alloy development, autoclave, water, steam, hydrides, microstructure, nuclear applications, radiation effects

    Author Information:

    Besch, OA
    Senior nuclear fuel engineer, PreussenElektra AG, Hannover,

    Yagnik, SK
    NIFR program manager, Electric Power Research Institute, Nuclear Power Group, Palo Alto, CA

    Woods, KN
    Technology development manager, Siemens Power Corporation, Richland, WA

    Eucken, CM
    Project leader, Teledyne Wah Chang, Albany, OR

    Bradley, ER
    Senior development metallurgist, Sandvik Special Metals Corp., Kennewick, WA

    Committee/Subcommittee: B10.01

    DOI: 10.1520/STP16202S