You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    STP1605

    Large Direct Shear Tests Performed with Fresh Ballast

    Published: 2018


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (2.11 MB) 18 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (19.05 MB) 245 $85   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Abstract

    This study evaluates the ballast shear strength from the testing of 20 specimens, performed in a very large direct shear box that has a shearing plane of 1 m by 1 m and can hold specimens with a thickness up to 80 cm. Tests comprise two different types of ballast (mylonitic and andesitic) and two different specimen preparation techniques (with and without compaction). The normal stresses used cover a wide range from 10 kPa to 400 kPa. Geometrical and physical properties of both ballasts were obtained according to EN-13450, Aggregates for Railway Ballast, showing that both ballasts are similar, can be ranked as high-quality class ballast and fulfill the recommended limiting values set by the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association. The values obtained for the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion were: (a) for noncompacted ballast—a friction angle of 39° combined with an “apparent cohesion” of 25 kPa, and (b) for compacted ballast—a friction angle of 50° and cohesion between 10 kPa and 20 kPa. Test results were also interpreted according to a parabolic model that proved the nonlinear nature of ballast shear envelope. The results also showed the decrease of secant friction angles with an increase of normal stress. It is worth remarking that, for very low normal stress (10 kPa), secant friction angles are around 70°, while for large stresses (400 kPa), they decrease to values around 40°. Finally, the use of direct shear boxes of two different sizes (30 cm by 30 cm and 1 m by 1 m) made it possible to analyze the scale effect in these tests. Test results show that the use of the smallest direct shear boxes produces an increase in the shear strength between 40 % and 60 %. Results obtained in this study agree well with those in the literature.

    Keywords:

    ballast, shear strength, large direct shear test, parabolic model, scale effect


    Author Information:

    Estaire, Jose
    CEDEX Track Box, Laboratorio de Geotecnia, Madrid,

    Santana, María
    CEDEX Track Box, Laboratorio de Geotecnia, Madrid,


    Committee/Subcommittee: D18.02

    DOI: 10.1520/STP160520170137