You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    STP1605

    Sampling, Reconstituting, and Gradation Testing of Railroad Ballast

    Published: 2018


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (677.06 KB) 9 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (19.05 MB) 245 $85   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Abstract

    Ballast characterization is important for predicting ballast performance and serviceability in track. This paper investigates ballast sampling methods and sizes, reconstitution, splitting, and gradation testing for appropriate characterization of in-track ballast. This paper will review various ASTM test methods and determine how these procedures should be applied to railroad ballast sampling and testing. For example, ASTM D75/75M, Standard Practice for Sampling Aggregates, and ASTM C136/136M, Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, require sampling ballast with a maximum particle diameter of 75 mm (3 in.) and about 16 to 17 three-quarters full 5-gal buckets to meet the requirements. These methods are important because of the difficulty of obtaining representative in-field ballast samples. Undisturbed ballast samples are not feasible because of the nature of unbonded granular particles, so sampling emphasis must be placed on best methods to collect and reconstitute field ballast conditions in the laboratory. Another aspect that will be discussed is how to deal with local variations in ballast fouling and degradation that can result in significant differences in ballast characteristics. For example, the ballast underneath the tie (i.e., the ballast of interest) will likely be more degraded and fouled than shoulder or crib ballast, but this is also the most difficult location to obtain without track disturbance.

    Keywords:

    ballast, rockfill, ballast sampling, sieve analysis


    Author Information:

    Stark, Timothy D.
    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Urbana, IL

    Wilk, Stephen T.
    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Urbana, IL

    Swan, Robert H.
    Drexel University, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Philadelphia, PA


    Committee/Subcommittee: D18.02

    DOI: 10.1520/STP160520170026