You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    STP1593

    Heat Strain in Chemical Protective Coveralls—Are Thermal Sweating Mannequin Tests More Informative than Sweating Hot Plate Tests?

    Published: 2016


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (252K) 17 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (17M) 417 $125   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Abstract

    Four chemical protective coveralls (CPCs) were tested for thermal insulation and evaporative resistance using both sweating hot plate and thermal sweating mannequin procedures. General agreement was found between the two sets of test results. Pearson's correlation analyses were conducted to determine the relationships between the material level (hot plate) measurements and garment level (mannequin) measurements and to compare them for their ability to predict human physiological responses related to thermal stress in the tested chemical protective clothing. The most influential factors for predicting thermal strain were found to be material level evaporative resistance and fabric thickness. Model-controlled sweating mannequin tests were also carried out and compared to human responses. This study showed that, for the selected CPC ensembles with high body coverage, the thermal sweating mannequin did not exceed the sweating hot plate in predicting thermal strain.

    Keywords:

    chemical protective coveralls, heat strain, sweating mannequin, sweating guarded hot plate


    Author Information:

    Wen, ShuQin
    University of Alberta, Dept. of Human Ecology, Edmonton,

    Batcheller, Jane
    University of Alberta, Dept. of Human Ecology, Edmonton,

    Petersen, Stewart
    University of Alberta, Dept. of Physical Education and Recreation, Edmonton,


    Committee/Subcommittee: F23.50

    DOI: 10.1520/STP159320160009