You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Fatigue Testing of Femoral Hip Prostheses with a Two-Beam Simulated Femoral Bone Support Fixture

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (300K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (3.1M) 161 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Changes in the design philosophy for femoral hip implants are resulting in new cementless designs that attempt to increase bone strain levels by increasing stem flexibility. Composite materials are often selected for these new implants because of the inherent ability to custom design the mechanical response of the material. Traditional test methods currently used for the evaluation of relatively stiff, homogeneous metallic implants may not be appropriate for the evaluation of these new prosthesis designs.

    This paper presents a new test fixture design that uses a two-beam structure to simulate the support provided in-vivo by the femoral bone. A prototype fixture was designed, built, and tested with composite hip prostheses to demonstrate the viability of the concept. Net head deflections and prosthesis strain levels were measured and compared to the response of the same implants when press fit and cemented in composite femurs.

    Data from these tests suggest that such a fixture design is capable of providing the required support and endurance for high cycle prosthesis fatigue testing. The net support was greater than that of a press fit implant but less than that of a cemented implant in a composite bone. Simulation of the most extreme stress state for the implant is most likely represented by the press fit case and therefor some modifications of the fixture design will be required to improve the support model.


    femoral hip testing, fatigue, composite femoral hip prostheses

    Author Information:

    Humphrey, SM
    Engineering Test Laboratory, Zimmer, Inc., Warsaw, IN

    Gilbertson, LN
    Engineering Test Laboratory, Zimmer, Inc., Warsaw, IN

    Committee/Subcommittee: F04.14

    DOI: 10.1520/STP15541S