You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    International Comparison of Impact Verification Programs

    Published: 01 January 2000

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (280K) 17 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (8.5M) 398 $136   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    A horizontal comparison is made between the four laboratories that certify Charpy impact verification specimens. The participants in this study were Japan (NRLM), France (LNE), the European Commission (IRMM), and the United States (NIST). The exercise was conducted to show how the impact verification programs, specimens, and test procedures compare with each other. Results for both 8 and 2 mm strikers were compared. The study showed the following: (1) The certified energies of impact verification specimens distributed by these four metrological authorities often agreed within 1% of the average values determined in this study; (2) the variation in energy for the specimens was low, typically bracketed by a coefficient of variation of between 0.02 and 0.04; and (3) the energies measured for the tests performed with 2 and 8 mm strikers on the 4340 steel specimens were nearly equivalent, but a trend of slightly higher energy for the 2 mm tests is indicated.


    Charpy impact verification, impact testing, verification testing, verification specimens

    Author Information:

    McCowan, CN
    NIST, Boulder, CO

    Pauwels, J
    EC-JRC-IRMM, Geel, Retieseweg

    Revise, G
    Mechanical and Equipment Testing, LNE, Trappes,

    Nakano, H
    NRLM, Ibarki,

    Committee/Subcommittee: E28.07

    DOI: 10.1520/STP14387S