You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Laundering Approaches for Decontaminating Structural Fire Fighting Protective Clothing

    Published: 01 January 1996

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (360K) 22 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (11M) 636 $86   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Fire fighters are routinely exposed to thermal, chemical, biological, and physical hazards. Risk of exposure to thermal and physical hazards is limited to the fireground while the potential for exposure to chemical and biological hazards continues until contaminated clothing has been effectively decontaminated. This study characterized clothing contamination levels in retired fire fighter turnout gear and evaluated the effectiveness of current laundering practices in decontaminating this protective clothing.

    Retired turnout coats, destructively evaluated using solvent extraction and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry, showed a variety of contaminants, some a significant concentrations. The relative effectiveness of six laundering techniques was determined against five materials using a technique to reproducibly contaminate and evaluate contaminant levels with six target chemicals. Dry cleaning was found to be the most efficient process for removing target contaminants while there was relatively little difference for most of the conventional laundering techniques. Force air circulation also provided effective in removing significant amounts of contamination. In addition, the effects of laundering procedures on clothing material performance were evaluated. The most significant changes was the reduction of water penetration resistance for a non-breathable moisture barrier material.


    Structural fire fighting, turnout gear, thermal protective clothing, cleaning, laundering, decontamination

    Author Information:

    Stull, JO
    President, International Personnel Protection, Inc., Austin,

    Dodgen, CR
    Manager, TRI/Environmental Inc., Austin, Texas

    Connor, MB
    Manager, TRI/Environmental Inc., Austin, Texas

    McCarthy, RT
    Chief, U.S. Fire Administration, Emmitsburg, Maryland

    Committee/Subcommittee: F23.93

    DOI: 10.1520/STP14086S