You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass

    Sampling Rate Effects in Automated Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Testing

    Published: 01 January 1994

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (372K) 22 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (15M) 662 $131   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    With the advent of ASTM Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates (E 647-91) and the associated annexes for nonvisual methods of monitoring crack length, there exists a need to address many aspects of the role that automation plays in generating fatigue crack growth rate data. The current ASTM standard provides primary guidance for visual methods of monitoring crack length and manual control of the test. The associated annexes provide guidance for two common nonvisual methods of monitoring crack length. Although they are good guides for both manual and automated control, they lack detail on many important considerations related to stress intensity (K) control, crack length precision, and load precision. This paper will emphasize the effect of sampling rate and resolution on crack length precision, dynamic load precision, and control. The issues will include analog-to-digital conversion resolution, digital filtering, peak reading, and multichannel phase considerations.


    fatigue crack growth, test automation, analog-to-digital conversion, data acquisition rates, peak readings, fracture (materials), fatigue (materials), testing methods, data analysis

    Author Information:

    Donald, JK
    Director, Fracture Technology Associates, Bethlehem, PA

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.06

    DOI: 10.1520/STP13946S