You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    STP1398

    Accreditation and Certification in Radioactivity Measurement: Experience of the CEA/Reactor Dosimetry Laboratory

    Published: 0


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (112K) 7 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (17M) 856 $273   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Abstract

    The Reactor Dosimetry Laboratory is involved in the French PWR pressure vessel surveillance program. It realizes the activity measurement of the dosimeters irradiated inside the surveillance capsules and it makes the data process to determine parameters such as flux and fluences.

    In 1996, The Reactor Dosimetry Laboratory obtained the ISO 9002 certification and the French Committee for Accreditation (COFRAC)/Testing Section accreditation (according to EN 45001 standard) for the gamma spectrometry measurement of the radioactivity of solid samples irradiated in nuclear reactors, extended in 1997 to the X-ray spectrometry measurement of niobium activity.

    The initial objective of the lab was the preservation of know-how that dates back 25 years; that is why COFRAC accreditation was chosen: it takes into account quality and technical evaluation. Thus, the description of our process is based upon ASTM standards.

    In addition, as ISO 9002 is an international standard, well-known abroad, the certification was also sought. Our lab was one of the first in France to obtain both certification and accreditation.

    The paper deals with ways and means of obtaining these two quality certificates: • organizational structure through which this project was performed; • quality system — the whole process is described through quality documents and records; • metrology requirements — operations which ensure that measuring equipment is usable and has the required performance (calibration, traceability against national standards, proficiency testing …). • other quality aspects — nonconformity, corrective actions, management review. The conclusion emphasizes on the feedback of this approach.

    Caret

    Keywords:

    quality, accreditation, certification, documentation, metrology, audit


    Author Information:

    Royer, JC
    Program Manager, CEA/DRN/DER/SPEx/LPE, CEA/Cadarache, Saint Paul lez Durance,

    Beretz, D
    Program Manager, CEA/DRN/DER/SPEx/LPE, CEA/Cadarache, Saint Paul lez Durance,


    Committee/Subcommittee: E10.96

    DOI: 10.1520/STP13661S