You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    STP1337

    The Specification of Crack Arrest Properties for Storage Tanks: Background and Recommendations

    Published: 01 January 1998


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (336K) 15 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (5.5M) 203 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Abstract

    Existing storage tank fracture prevention design criteria aim at the avoidance of fracture initiation. However, catastrophic failures have shown that the avoidance of crack initiation can never be guaranteed in any absolute sense. Consequently, European specifications increased initiation toughness requirements to reduce further the risk of failure and modified tank design concepts to alleviate the consequences of failure. It could be argued on safety and economic grounds that the use of crack arrest concepts for storage tanks may be the better option. In the present paper, the comparison of a collection of structurally representative large-scale test results with small-scale material characterisation tests shows that there is now a wealth of data available supporting the use of the ‘Pellini’ drop-weight test as a proxy for structural crack arrest behaviour, which is therefore recommended as design criterion for crack arrest during storage tanks fabrication. It is noted that, for a complete structural integrity evaluation of storage tanks, it is necessary to also consider the ductile tearing stability of long arrested cracks.

    Keywords:

    Storage tanks, crack arrest, design criteria, fracture avoidance, drop-weight test


    Author Information:

    Wiesner, CS
    TWI, Abington, Cambridge

    Garwood, SJ
    TWIRolls Royce and Associates, Derby,

    Denham, JB


    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.04

    DOI: 10.1520/STP12350S