You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Comparison of Slip Resistance Measurements between Two Tribometers Using Smooth and Grooved Neolite®-Test-Liner Test Feet


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (160K) 6 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (3.0M) 143 $55   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Differences in slip resistance measurements under dry and wet conditions on the same smooth walkway surface may occur when testing with a Neolite®4-Test-Liner (NTL) test foot using the PIAST [Slip Test Mark II] and VIT [English XL] tribometers. To investigate the causes of these differences, two sets of NTL test feet (smooth and grooved) for each instrument were cut from the same piece of material. Slip-resistance measurements were made under both wet and dry conditions. The same operator was used for each tribometer, an observer monitored each test, and all testing was performed in the same room at the same time. The walkway surfaces were commercial floor materials.

    On dry surfaces, the measured slip resistance using the grooved test foot was the same or lower than the results using the smooth test feet. On wet surfaces, measured slip resistance using the grooved test feet increased slightly with the VIT and significantly using the PIAST. Averaged test results showed that the use of the grooved test feet on both instruments brought the readings these devices closer to each other; using the grooved test foot, the readings generated by the PIAST and VIT were not significantly different.


    slip resistance, tribometer, walkway surface, grooved test feet

    Author Information:

    Medoff, H
    Associate Professor of Engineering, Perm State University, Abington, PA

    Fleisher, DH
    President, David H. Fleisher, Inc., Fort Washington, PA

    Di Pilla, S
    Director of Product Development, ESIS Risk Control Services, Philadelphia, PA

    Committee/Subcommittee: F13.40

    DOI: 10.1520/STP10741S